Select Page
← Go Back

A common debate in project management circles is between the two styles of creating and executing a project plan: top-down and bottom-up. Top-down strategy involves the management of a project, i.e. the project manager having complete control over the delegation of tasks and the setting of the project schedule and deadlines. On the other hand, the bottom-up approach calls for more input from those who will be completing the tasks.

As we have already investigated the comparison of top-down vs. bottom-up strategy, we will take a closer look at just one of those options to make it easier to figure out which one suits your management style or individual project the best.

If you think that you’d like to start incorporating more of the bottom-up approach into your project planning processes, here are some of the factors to take into consideration.

Five Things to Know About the Bottom-Up Strategy

1. Fosters inclusive task planning

The most obvious difference between top-down and bottom-up strategy is the influence all team members have on how and when tasks will be completed. The logic is that someone who is closely involved with a certain field will be able to better estimate what needs to be done and how long it will take. This leads to better approximations of deadlines and more significant project milestones.

The downside can be that project planning takes longer as more stakeholders need to be involved, but the advantages are often considered to outweigh this problem.

2. Facilitates clearer communication

To achieve a successful implementation of the bottom up approach, strong communication with team members is an absolute necessity. This requires high levels of both trust and of comfort. Not all team members may be confident enough to speak their mind in front of a group (although it can be easier in a virtual meeting setting), but to make sure the bottom-up strategy succeeds, all those involved need to be able to contribute to the project plan.

3. Affords unique insights

One of the major advantages of the bottom-up strategy is that it allows you to make decisions with a much wider pool of knowledge. As each additional team member is involved, they contribute their own unique knowledge and experience of the tasks that need to be completed. Thus, the overall project plan will have a much higher degree of accuracy for the individual elements of each task strand.

4. Makes employees feel more appreciated

Employee recognition is increasingly one of the most important elements of job satisfaction. While not adopting a truly horizontal approach, a bottom-up strategy lets team members know that their views are being listened to and their knowledge is valued. This leads to greater loyalty and feelings of ownership among team members, as well as the advantages for the project itself.

5. Allows you to maximize potential

With a top-down strategy, it is incumbent on the project manager to fully discern the strengths and weaknesses of each team member and delegate appropriate tasks to them. With a bottom-up approach, however, each employee can help their PM by making them aware of their own opinion of their abilities. This enables a project manager to tap resources which they may not have been fully aware of before and thus maximize the productivity of their team.

When it comes to choosing between a top-down and bottom-up approach, there’s no right or wrong answer – it boils down to what’s best for your team, your management style, and your project. It may even entail some trial-and-error. No matter your management style, though, enterprise project management software can make your life easier. Sign up for a live demo of Clarizen today.

 


What are you waiting for?

Learn why Clarizen is the right choice to engage your workforce and accelerate your business.

Learn How to Get 30% Higher Return on PPM Assets. Get the Full 2020 Gartner Market Guide
Preview: 2020 Gartner Market Guide for Adaptive Project Management & Reporting

Pick a PPM solution with the best capabilities to match your unique needs


In the 2020 Gartner Market Guide for Adaptive Project Management & Reporting guide, Gartner, Inc. provides recommendations and evaluation criteria for executives and PMO leaders assessing Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) solutions. This guide outlines the adaptive project management and reporting process flow as well as a market review of current providers in the following categories:

  • - Existing pure-play PPM providers
  • - Collaborative work management (CWM) providers
  • - Enterprise agile planning (EAP) providers
  • - Technology Platform providers from other markets

The guide provides insight into how well a product or service fulfills certain functional capabilities – with a forward-looking market direction and analysis provided.

In the report, Gartner, Inc. mentions/states that “by 2024, 50% of all program and portfolio management (PPM) leaders will integrate complementary technologies to enable portfolio decision making and adaptive work management for digital business evolution.”

Clarizen offers a complete solution that connects work across the enterprise, turning ideas into strategies, plans, and action. With Clarizen, organizations can work the way they want to work and have real time visibility across all workstreams in their portfolio. This keeps teams focused on the things that matter, provides the real-time information needed to make more accurate and timely decisions, and delivers results faster to meet and even exceed company goals and customers’ expectations.

Discover what sets Clarizen apart from other vendors in the marketplace.
If you like the preview and want the FULL PDF file, please provide your information and you can download it
Buyer’s guide to project management software
1/2